Schnazz

Yes we can!

It's good to see you're not satisfied and ready to start over to be better. With that attitude you're gonna do very well. :thumbsup:

Happy birthday man! Enjoy it!

Tupac - Dear Mama

AMEN!

Awesome and Awesome. I can't wait till tomorrow night!

Ahahahaha!

Ahahahahahaha!

Go Giants!

...and to be able to watch it over and over again until you can recite every line.

Not really though

Awesome!

There is

I liked the music to The Illest, the horror movie sound. Dreamer's Dream had a good hook. I dug your flow the best on Reality Check, cool skit at the end. Leave Me Be has a lot of promise, but your flow seemed a bit too jagged. Two Sides to Every Story was your best track. The only part I wasn't digging was the hook. The story itself seemed like it coulda been better, but was good regardless. Congrats on putting this together, it's a great accomplishment!

Whoa, 30 or 35? When did DVD's get so expensive?

Hey man, on Dreamers Dream, that hook sounds familiar, is it from something?

What specific policy was that? Why would Bush need to give Greenspan the go ahead? The Fed is independent of the White House. What move was that? What policies and how is it the result of those policies? How did the Clinton administration foster faith in the IT sector? And how much is too much? Surely a certain amount of faith was good, since IT did produce some significant results in the 90's. (just not as much as it was valued at)

I just get myself killed and stay online for a while to trick people into wasting time trying to attack me. It's petty, sure, but it's all I got.

Miller, Roger LeRoy. Economics Today. 14. New York City: Addision Wesley, 2007. I'm working from the 13th edition, but I'm guessing it's probably pretty similar. I haven't had time to go through it in too much detail yet, but I found the following quote in the chapter on fiscal policy: So ok, time lag exists, I'm with ya. The time to get congress to agree to a policy. The time for the policy to affect the economy. Etc... But the time scale is 1-3 years and doesn't even fill the entire first term of a president, let alone the 12 years of Reagan/Bush 1, the 8 years of Clinton, or the now 7 years of Bush 2. By the above logic, right now we're feeling the results of the Bush administrations time and the boon in 98 was a result of the Clinton administrations time.

This game feels more more sniper-esque

Game on!

Sounds good.

Quite good! Though I thought his Iowa speech was even better. And did you see the size of that victory? WuHu! He doubled Clinton's vote!

Magic, naturally.

Clinton embraced the dot-com bubble by allowing the fed rates to be high even when the burst was becoming obvious. Basically he let the well dry before anyone did anything. Instead of trying to cut rates initially, they sat back, as they felt it was too good to fall apart. No one did their homework on the economy in that administration. But the federal reserve sets the rates and it's an independent agency. If you want to blame someone for the rates, surely it should be Greenspan. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/suppl/empsit.cpseea1.txt), unemployment was at 5.0% for December of 2007 and 4.6% for 2007 over all. While this is down for the current administration from the high 2003 of 6.0%, it's not a new low. 2000 has the lowest unemployment for nearly 40 years at 4.0%. When it comes to our economy, I think we can pretty safely say that Bush has seriously harmed it. Nearly 500 billion dollars spent on war during his two terms is disastrous. And thanks for the reference!