viber_91
-
Posts
1,061 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Calendar
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by viber_91
-
-
Jason Bateman on Countdown with Keith Olbermann:
http://video.msn.com/video.aspx?mkt=en-us&...54-cd050befde5b
-
-
And another positive one:
Rating: ********''**
Summary:"Hancock" is a fantastic superhero movie… despite never having had a comic book. Will Smith is great as the misguided hero while Jason Bateman and Charlize Theron make an excellent supporting cast. It has some hilarious comedy, some great action, and a few surprises that fortunately haven't been ruined by the commercials and trailers. But keep the kiddies at home – this is a grown-up's comic book movie.
Story:
"Hancock" is not your typical superhero. In fact, you'd be hard pressed to call him a hero at all. He's more like a bum with an attitude that is super strong, invulnerable, and can fly. And though he occasionally helps people out, it usually ends in mass destruction and public outrage. Fortunately, he's the only one of his kind.
But when he saves the life of publicist Ray Embrey, he finds a new ally. Ray makes it his mission to turn public opinion in Hancock's favor and transform him into the hero that he has the potential to be. The first step? Allow the law to lock him up in prison so the public can see just how much they need a hero. But how much will Hancock be willing to put up with in order to change his ways?
"Hancock" is rated PG-13 for some intense sequences of sci-fi action and violence, and language.
What Worked:
Some of you may be aware that I'm co-publisher of Red 5 Comics. So far we've discovered that superhero comics are some of the most challenging to create for three reasons – it's hard to find a take on superheroes that hasn't been done already, it's hard to find a superhero story that's interesting, and it's hard to get the public to pick up a superhero comic after they've had their fix of Marvel and DC superheroes. Yet somehow the creators of "Hancock" have managed to find a superhero story that's original, entertaining, and stands well on its own against any Marvel or DC superhero.
Will Smith's Hancock is a great character. I mean, how often do you get to see a superhero flying with a bottle of booze, running into seagulls, and telling off the people he saves? It's so satisfying to see a superhero doing very un-heroic things with his powers. And while he's very funny, he definitely has a serious side. He goes through an internal struggle as he voluntarily sits in jail. You can see the conflict on his face as he chooses to stay in prison despite being able to walk out at any moment. It's a whole different take on the theme of "with great power comes great responsibility." When Hancock inevitably does the right thing, his debut as a true hero is one of the best scenes in any movie this summer.
Another great aspect of Hancock is his back-story. Unfortunately, I can't get into it without ruining the plot. In fact the less you know about it going in, the more you're going to enjoy the movie. But I will say that it hearkens back to the roots of what comics are all about. The origin of Hancock is so in line with what Siegel and Shuster would have done or what Lee and Kirby would have done. This is one of the best comic book movies that never had a comic book.
Smith is excellent as Hancock, but his supporting cast helps tremendously. Jason Bateman is fantastic as Ray Embrey. He's so hopelessly optimistic and idealistic that he's a great contrast to Hancock. His reactions to Hancock's over-the-top antics are priceless. You can't help but love him. Charlize Theron is also impressive as Mary Embrey. Her love for Ray and disgust with Hancock is equally believable. When the story takes its surprise twist, she really begins to shine. Hancock also makes great use of the extras and minor background characters as they react to Hancock, too. You'll find more than one throwaway line by a kid or spectator that will make you laugh.
I also have to commend the creators and Sony marketing – they kept a number of Hancock's surprises hidden. There's one major revelation in the film and it's quite a turning point for the story. It takes it to another level and if you go in with minimal knowledge of the story, you'll find it a lot more entertaining.
What Didn't Work:
If Randy Jackson were reviewing "Hancock," he'd say it was a little "pitchy". "Hancock" varies dramatically in tone and almost seems like three different movies in one. The first third of the movie where Hancock is a hated bum is very much a comedy. From physical gags to jokes, it's a superhero comedy. The middle third has some humor, but it's heavily action-oriented and filled with a lot of serious character moments mixed with big special effects. It's more of a superhero action-adventure. The final third of the film is very dark and very dramatic. There's some heavy material there to the point that you're wondering if you're watching the same movie. Don't get me wrong… it's all quite good. You just might find yourself in the last 15 minutes saying, "Man, this is a lot darker than I was expecting." Don't worry… the movie ends on a high note. (In fact, don't get up when the credits start rolling or you'll end up standing in the aisle to watch the final scene.)
I also recommend that parents heed the PG-13 rating. Just because this is a Will Smith superhero movie doesn't mean it's kid-friendly. There's a lot of language, some graphic violence, and more. This is an adult's superhero movie.
The Bottom Line:
Bring on "Hancock 2"!
-
Here's a positive one (spoilers):
In a world where directors of even the shallowest, most popcorn-munching summer action flick feel obliged to keep you in the cinema for at least two bladder-testing hours, Will Smith's new superhero comedy Hancock is a breath of fresh air. It clocks in at a tight, unpretentious 90 minutes. It feels like longer though – in a good way. The expected ‘drunken superhero in Miles Davis sunnies gets a makeover’ arc is wrapped up in the first hour, giving way to a darker second section in which the invulnerable, almost immortal protagonist gets a taste of what it means to be truly human.Indeed, the movie only really returns to its early light action comedy tone with the now-obligatory post-credits skit, in which the costume-designers own up to having plagiarised their own Wolverine costume.
The movie achieves its refreshing brevity by dispensing with the usual origin sequence, delivering the hero to us as an already washed-up, but still eminently likeable force of nature. We get an insight into the hero’s background later in the film as it’s revealed that he’s part of a lost race of supermen who were once revered as gods but who died out because of one fatal flaw. Their power is diminished whenever they come close to one of their own kind. It’s a good thing that Hancock is all alone in the world. Or is he?
It’s worth noting that the movie’s title makes a lot more sense in the US, where John Hancock’s ebullient penmanship on the declaration of independence gives rise to the expression ‘John Hancock’ meaning signature. We’re more likely to think of Anthony Aloysius Hancock, and whereas the movie has, especially in its opening section, some very funny moments it’s got nothing to do with Blood Donors or Radio Hams.
It may not be one of the Big Three superhero movies this summer, but Hancock shouldn’t be overlooked. Despite its slightly uneven tone it has great action, great comedy, and even (unusually for a movie of its kind) some actual acting.
Best of all, it’ll only cost you an hour and a half. With England out of Euro 2008, it’s the best ninety minutes of the Summer.
http://timesonline.typepad.com/blockbuster...buster-rev.html
-
-
New review:
Based on the early test screening reviews of Hancock... reviews of a film that is different in many ways from the one being released into theaters... I kind of understand the general negativity surrounding the film.But that’s why test screening reviews are a load of ****.
I’m not going to review the movie now, but while there are still some shaving bumps, this is easily the most ambitious action script of the summer to date, solid in ways that none of the failed movies that some are amusing themselves by comparing it to never were, and while it’s probably not a good bet to surpass I Am Legend at the box office, it is not only a likely hit, but it is likely to be one of those films that grows in importance (as important as action movies can be) in retrospect.
The thing that is odd, from this seat, is that the film is, once again, so Peter Berg. For me, Berg has become one of the great genre directors of his generation. His films embrace the silliness and the over-the-top of genre, but he goes to a darker place in the characters he makes films about and in that, delivers films that have all the action but speak to an adult, thoughtful sensibility.
So yes, it is possible that I am reading this wrong commercially. It would be par for the course in my experience with Berg. Will Smith assures a big opening. So it will be Berg’s biggest film. But will it be commensurate with Smith’s recent history?
I really don’t know.
The film is mouthy enough to become a sweetheart for the teens. It’s not a superhero movie in a conventional geek-wetting way. By the end, you realize, that they are really doing a different genre altogether, using superheroism as background metaphor. But Hancock is a superhero who does what a real human being might expect to do with these powers… far more honestly than, say, Iron Man. That said, a big part of the appeal of Iron Man was the hero fantasy that audiences identified with. If you want to identify with Hancock, you are going to have to put yourself through a bit of self-examination.
By the end, the closing conventions of superhero movies like Spider-Man and Batman are very much intact. But the road to that end is far more demanding of the audience.
But this is no Wild Wild West. Not even close.
And if you want to see the movie the way you should, be very, very, very careful of reviews because one major spoiler is significant enough to the story that critics will have a very hard time not giving it away. And for me, that moment when you realize that you don’t know what they are going to do with the third act is one of the great movie experiences… especially in a genre film. (I knew exactly what would happen in the late second act before the movie was 10 minutes old... and was pleased to anticipate it.)
Of course, that complexity and the pre-release negativity will probably lead to a phalanx of mixed reviews. Rise above. Clean your mind. The movie may be better than you expect or worse, but do try to embrace the experience of having that experience for yourself. If you want to know what’s going to happen before you see a movie, there is always episodic television.
-
Uploaded Will on Letterman, 150 MB approx to sendspace.
:2thumbs:
Thanx!
-
Hancock would make a great comic book movie, and thanks for the Letterman links Viber, I recorded it last night got back from work and watched it, if anyone wants to download it to his PC in much better quality, let me know I'll upload it just in case.
Ty if you don't care I'd like to watch it in better quality, but only if you have time ;-)
yeah, me too. But only if you have the time...
-
-
Another review:
From a movie-going standpoint, there are two kinds of Fourth of July weekends.There are July 4th weekends with a new Will Smith movie coming out, and there are July 4th weekends with no Will Smith movie coming out.
This upcoming Fourth is the former. Lucky us.
And even luckier still is that this particular Will Smith movie is not “Wild Wild West.”
You’ll have to determine for yourself where it stands in the pantheon of Will Smith movies, but I enjoyed it very much.
No spoiler alert is needed right here. I intend to give nothing away. Any person who gives away key plot twists before you have a chance to see the movie is a jerk.
I will tell you what it’s about. Smith plays an alcoholic superhero. He’s got most of Superman’s powers, but none of his class. In fact, people can’t stand him. Jason Bateman is hysterical as a public relations guy who tries to rehabilitate the superhero’s image. Charlize Theron, looking considerably better than her “Monster” days, portrays Bateman’s wife.
I won’t tell you anymore about the story. Peter Berg (”Very Bad Things,” “Friday Night Lights“) did an exceptional job directing his first superhero film, and he made it different than any superhero movie you’ve ever seen. Sure, it has spectacular special effects, but it’s got angst up the ying-yang.
You think Spider-Man has issues? Hancock’s issues could beat up Spider-Man’s issues.
This movie should make a few bucks. It might even be the number one movie for the five-day holiday weekend - by about $100 million.
“Hancock” opens July 2.
http://barry.freedomblogging.com/2008/06/2...ncock-i-saw-it/
-
Hancock interview/review:
Rating: *****
“There hasn’t been a new superhero in maybe forty years,” says Will Smith who plays the title character in Columbia Pictures ‘Hancock’. “Spider-Man, Iron Man and Batman and Superman, those were our fathers’ superheros. It’s very hard to create a new superhero.”“It’s so hard to come up with something original,” says Academy Award-winner Charlize Theron. “I think that it’s always brave to take something that’s a quintessential loved genre, which is the superhero, especially in the American culture, to kind of turn that upside-down and say, let’s look at that from a completely different angle. What if superheros weren’t perfect?”
“Hancock doesn’t know everything about Hancock,” says Smith. “Things begin to reveal themselves in the second half.” Theron says, “We have to get him into a situation where he can turn his life around.”
“We looked in the creation of Hancock at Greek mythology,” says Smith. “There were gods and everything, but they had regular problems.”
“What if they were actually closer to us as human beings?” says Theron. “What if they were alcoholics and they were tired of saving people? What if they were actually lonely and wished they had love? Basically, a superhero on Dr. Phil.”
“He drinks a little too much,” says Smith. “He’s an alcoholic superhero. He can fly, but he flies drunk. He flies into buildings. The only difficult part was the flying. We built these flying rigs. A lot of the flying stuff is real, practical, in the air, gravity.”
“The technology out there today is just incredible,” says Theron. “And what they can do is absolutely insane. I think it’s become a little safer, especially since I did ‘Aeon Flux’.” The star had to take a month from filming ‘Aeon Flux’ after she injured her back doing her own stunts.
“I like that we were creating a new superhero, and I like that he was flawed,” says Theron. “What I liked about this is it was the most human story that I’ve read in a long time. It really dealt with the human condition. As actors you’re always inspired and excited to delve into a world that deals with human behavior. I thought it was flawed and interesting.”
“Hancock said everything he wanted to say and did everything that he wanted to do,” says Smith. “It’s so opposite of how I lead own life. There’s so much concern and care to say and do things right in the press. I just love that Hancock doesn’t care at all.”
“My character gets to really fall on her face and learning what that means for her,” says Smith. “I’m always interested to play women who are conflicted and find themselves in environments where they don’t always get to make the best decisions. Where life takes over and emotion takes over and human behavior takes over.”
“She likes being a teacher and loves driving her stepson to soccer until the day this guy drops in,” says Theron. “Hancock. She hates him. She absolutely hates him. There’s a real animosity instantly towards him, which of course means she’s crazy about him, in girl terms. Boys don’t realize that. The meaner we are, the more we’re into you.”
“It was a great time,” says Theron. “It was a pleasure. Will and I had done a film eight years ago called the legend of Bagger Vance. We had a great time on that. We didn’t get to work together as much on that as we did on this. Jason and I worked on Arrested Development together. I knew him and fell in love with him a bit on that. Peter is great energy. He’s crazy, but really smart.”
“The cast was hugely important,” says Smith. “He likes to ‘find it’. “The way that Pete Berg likes to shoot is unrehearsed. The cameras are all handheld so everybody can move. If you do something, great, he can go in and get it. There’s an improvisational free-form feeling.
Hancock owes a lot to ‘Spider-Man’, another superhero who was an ordinary guy who had power thrust upon him. For Hancock, a superhero with no mission, with great power comes great irresponsibility. A drunk Hancock still saves lives. However, the collateral property damage is extensive. An idealistic publicist takes Hancock under his wing to give him a make-over.
Will Smith brings likability and rough charm. Charlize Theron looks beautiful, as always. Jason Bateman plays the straight man, setting up the laughs. The title ‘Hancock’ was thankfully changed from the working title of ‘Tonight, He Comes.”
‘Hancock’ is funny with lots of action, although a bit violent and derelict. Great for superhero fans.
-
Thanx for those Ale!
A bit off-topic, but... Does anybody know what Will is gonna do after Hancock and Seven Pounds? I heard that Mann wants to direct Empire early next year, but maybe that's just a rumor, does anybody know what Wills next movie will be after Seven Pounds?
You're welcome.
Well, that's a good question, and I would like to know the answer, but I'm afraid I have no idea. If he doesn't play Bobby Seale in 'The Trial of the Chicago 7', I think his next movie could be 'Empire', but we'll have to wait to confirm that. Who knows, maybe Will wants to take some months off before filming more movies. So I repeat: we'll have to wait to know it.
Apart from that, I haven't heard anything new about 'Time Share', that movie with Nick Cage. It probably has been cancelled. Hope so since I can't stand Mr. Cage.
In the new Letterman interview, Will said he's taking 5 months off now, so maybe he starts shooting Empire early next year, I relly hope that. I'm guessing we'll hear more when he starts promoting seven pounds...
New clip:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=pt07CfeAx50
- I really hate myself cause I'm watching all of these clips, I know that it ruins a lot of the movie...
And some comic book covers:
-
Will on Letterman:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=lFRPIwZrcyQ
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=6lv4caQ7G04
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=HdL4xDjdS3o
- ok, so five months off, so the next movie should start early next year... I'm hoping it's Empire!
-
Thanx for those Ale!
A bit off-topic, but... Does anybody know what Will is gonna do after Hancock and Seven Pounds? I heard that Mann wants to direct Empire early next year, but maybe that's just a rumor, does anybody know what Wills next movie will be after Seven Pounds?
-
A few new samples from the soundtrack:
http://www.hans-zimmer.com/~hybrid/powell/Hancock16.mp3
http://www.hans-zimmer.com/~hybrid/powell/Hancock19.mp3
http://www.hans-zimmer.com/~hybrid/powell/Hancock20.mp3
I just bought the CD from ebay, and I must say, that it's great, much better than the I am Legend score if you ask me. But you can really hear the tone shift in the music. The first half of the CD has music you would expect in a movie like shark tale, and the 2nd half has music you would expect in I am Legend except for a few tracks that are more uplifting action/adventure, kindof lika an action/drama movie. But it's a great, and i mean GREAT, CD!
-
-
New review:
Rating: *****
Ten minutes into Will Smith’s latest, Hancock, you can’t help but feel that you’re getting exactly what the latest trailer promised you. There’s a big car chase, there’s lots of gunfire, and in the midst of it is Will Smith as Hancock, lying on a park bench, nursing a bottle and a mighty-looking hangover. Thing is, Hancock has super powers, even if he’s reluctant to use them. So cue one superhero rescue sequence later, replete with $9m of damage done in the process, and the scene is set for the mix of comedy and action that you’re probably ready to sign up for.Sadly though, it doesn’t seem to be what everyone else was there to make. For enter stage left comes Jason Bateman’s PR agent Ray, a down-to-earth man who – courtesy of a really impressive rescue scene – meets Hancock and decides, by way of appreciation, to tackle his image problem. For Hancock isn’t a liked superhero – courtesy of the trail of destruction he leaves in his wake – and it soon turns out that there’s a warrant for his arrest, in addition to passers-by hurling abuse in his direction.
But this is where the tone of the film changes, as it takes an unexpected and generally unsuccessful turn. For Ray – who lives with his wife Mary (Charlize Theron) and small son - is a man who wants to change the world but can’t (the irony being of course that Hancock can change the world, but frequently doesn’t). When he sees how the world takes to Hancock, he sees his chance to do some good, and persuades him to surrender himself to the authorities, curb his drinking, control his anger and do a little time.
This should have been, certainly in the hands of a gifted comedian such as Smith, the opportunity to flex some comedy muscles, and one or two moments do demonstrate what could have been here. After all, doesn’t this whole reluctant, sarcastic, one-liner spouting hero thing sound like something Will Smith could do in his sleep?
Yet the film, oddly, switches more towards melancholy drama than summer blockbuster, and it never really recovers as a result. As Hancock faces his issues, the tone suddenly seems to become more sombre than Smith’s last film, I Am Legend, and you’re never quite sure why.
And it leaves Hancock the film in a quandary, for in the aftermath of this it has an identity crisis it never really resolves. Considering its brief 92 minute running time, much of it is spent with the key characters sitting around and chatting, looking mournful and appearing to be anything-but the cast of a superhero movie. This, however, isn’t a choice that those behind the camera feel confident with, because every now and then they throw in an overt blockbuster moment. In fact, come the middle of the film is a quite terrific fight scene, swirling with great special effects and real big screen impact. Then, quick as a flash, it’s gone again, as everyone sits around to work out their problems and have another chat. It’s the same too for those few comedic moments: when they’re thrown in, they work quite well, but they simply feel like they were put there to sell the movie, rather than part of a coherent whole.
The frustration is that there’s a boldness in what Hancock is attempting to do. It bothers to throw in a couple of curveballs (whether you like them or not), and the underlying concept of a superhero movie where the central character struggles with his place in life - to the point of regularly hitting the bottle - is open to exploration. But there’s simply not the courage of Hancock’s convictions to do it. Considering it’d be a tough sell at the best of times to get away with all of this in a Will Smith 4th July movie, it’s perhaps the ultimate lack of belief in its own concept that hurts the film most.
There are other problems, too, that come as a by-product of Hancock’s choices. There’s no villain of note, no real peril to push against for instance. Plus, even when Hancock is locked up, you never get the feeling – save for the odd news report – that he’s needed on the outside. And by the time it’s all wrapped up with an ending that fails to satisfy or impress, you’re left wondering just what it was that they actually intended to make in the first place (although you’ll still be able to calculate how much you reckon YouTube contributed to the budget, in exchange for all the name checks it gets).
Yet in the midst of all of this, the ingredients are there. There’s some great effects work in places (and the occasional bit of, er, not-so-great effects work, especially the early flying sequence), Charlize Theron is on good form and there are sparks and splutters when Hancock occasionally threatens to burst into life. But Peter Berg’s final cut has the feel of a film that’s been chopped around a little too much (with reports of reshoots running quite close to the eventual release date), and to call it uneven would be, sad to say, rather generous. Berg, to his credit, composes some good sequences here, but it’s a long way from his outstanding Friday Night Lights.
Sadly, that muddled advertising campaign that’s been talked about elsewhere on the Internet has ultimately proven to be a fair reflection of the end product. Removed from a summer release slot, and with a bit less pressure to deliver a traditional Will Smith blockbuster, Hancock may have stood more a chance, and been able to follow through on its gamble. As it stands, it hedges too many bets, and is likely to neither satisfy those after a run-of-the-mill Will Smith action comedy, nor those in search of something a little deeper. A pity.
-
Jason on Conan:
Will on the today show:
http://movies.popcrunch.com/will-smith-tal...day-show-video/
-
Cool new poster:
-
Will Smith will appear on The Colbert Report, and Will, Charlize and Jason will be on TRL this tuesday...
-
Another one:
Rating: ***''*
Easy sell for this: Will Smith = alcoholic superhero. Throw in another great exercise in comic timing from Jason "Arrested Development" Bateman and a slow-burner from Charlize Theron and you've got a winner.Bateman's a PR exec who takes on Hancock's case after being saved from a train wreck (Hancock does the train-wrecking), and tries to rework his image so LA starts seeing him as a hero, and not a super-strong bum. Theron is Bateman's homely wife, who doesn't want to see him get burned by a loser like Hancock.
Director Peter Berg proved he could pull off a smart thriller with The Kingdom and he expands on that here, pushing the d-runk flying, whale-chucking, city-trashing jokes as far as they'll go - and then flipping the movie into a whole other zone after the first act. Worked as a nice surprise for me after seeing the trailer - which gives zero hints about where it's heading - so we'll leave it at that here. It's enough to say: this is darker than it looks, and more interesting. The action works, but it's the smaller moments that makes this film so enjoyable - Hancock using his super-strength to shave, popping out bulletproof glass with a flick etc - it's a like a kitchen sink drama (where they occasionally chuck the kitchen sink out of the kitchen).
A few more points in its favour:
*First ever on-screen cameo from Berg's mentor Michael Mann.
*One of the few big-budget films in recent years to come in at the chimp-approved 92 minute-mark. Apparently there was a two-hour cut which may appear on the eventual dvd, and there are a few moments where you wonder if they've chopped out some backstory (mainly with the film's designated Brit baddie Eddie Marsan) - but I'd take that over a bloated two-hour blahthon anyday.
*It's a drunk superhero - what's not to love?
-
New Hancock Review:
Rating: ***''*
Smith movie comes a certain level of expectation, as the man essentially embodies the career Tom Cruise had ten years ago. As the biggest movie star on the planet, he must tread the line between commercial and artistically fulfilling, whilst also not disappointing his core audience. Hancock is a movie that does both admirably, but doesn't gel quite well enough to rank as a home run. Hancock's plot sees Big Willy play the titular alcoholic Superhero, who seems to do just as much bad as good when rescuing folk. When he saves the life of a kind-hearted PR agent (Bateman), he vows to make him more likeable in the eyes of the judgemental public. Those who have seen the trailer won't be surprised to learn that there is no real villain here; sure, people are out to get him - but no one who could really hurt him. It's not your conventional 'bad guy versus good guy' flick, or even a slant on it; it's a film about a drunken superhero who wants to figure out who he is. While this is all very well done, the tone can be drastically uneven and a twist comes out of nowhere, only to be explained away with a couple of lines of dialogue. The script has many problems, too - the main one being an overreliance on coincidence that is hard to swallow at times. There are still moments of real brilliance though, and it's Hancock's attitude problem that's the reason for most of them, as Smith's sharp comic timing shows little sign of blunting. Peter Berg, too, is a director still firmly in the mould of Michael Mann (who produces and makes an amusing cameo), meaning he likes his handheld camera and knows exactly where to put it (usually on an extreme close-up of Smith at a particularly ponderous moment.) Theron is fine, if untested, while Bateman is excellent in a beefed-up supporting role. It has many flaws, and some will find them distracting; but for this reviewer, the pros outweighed the cons and delivered a film that while far from perfect, still hit all the right chords. Stick around after the credits for the best line in the movie.Review by Mike Sheridan
-
New interview with Will:
-
BILL SIENKIEWICZ COVERS HANCOCK
In support of the forthcoming Will Smith film "Hancock," which itself is not based on an existing comic book, Sony Pictures has commissioned a number of noted comic book artists to create faux comics-style cover artwork depicting the titular super-powered character in action. Those approached include Jock, Neal Adams, Darwyn Cooke and the venerable Bill Sienkiewicz, who provided CBR News with this first look at his contribution.
Will On Tv!
in Will Smith Movies
Posted
Will on The Colbert Report:
http://movies.popcrunch.com/will-smith-on-...t-report-video/